BUSDOX
  • Home
  • Product Desc.
  • Process Walk Thru
    • Planning >
      • Governance
      • Requirements Validation
      • Procurement Strategy
      • Sourcing Strategy
      • Schedule, Financials and Quality
    • Preparation >
      • Team Building
      • Preparation of Documentation
      • Bidder Discovery and Pre-selection
    • Implementation >
      • Issue RFx
      • Receive Bids
      • Evaluation
      • Validation
      • Interim Recommendation
    • Negotiation >
      • Best and Final Offer
      • Final Evaluation
      • Final Validation
      • Final Recommendation
    • Contracts >
      • Governance Endorsement
      • Contract Negotiation and Drafting
      • Contract Execution
      • Procurement Closure
  • Library (Sneek Peek)
    • Preview PDE004 Process Guide
    • Preview PCH003 Process Checklist
    • Preview PCH009 Internal Interview Checklist
    • Preview PRE006 Risk Register
    • Preview PRD003 EOI Information Schedule
    • Preview PMO003 Overall Assessment Model
    • Preview PRP010 Fortnightly Governance Report
    • Preview PPR001 Bidder Induction Presentation
    • Preview PPR005 Evaluation Methodology Presentation
    • Preview PCO007 Request for SIte Visit Letter
    • Preview PRF004 Request for Expression Of Interest
    • Preview PRF007 Request for Proposal
    • Preview PMT001 Procurement Plan
    • Preview PMT004 Evaluation Methodology
  • Library (Clients Only)
  • Blog
  • About
  • FAQ
  • Contact
  • Policy
    • Copyright
    • Privacy
    • Disclaimer
    • General Terms and Conditions

What is Financial Matching and Why Do We Do It?

20/2/2015

2 Comments

 
One of the very important validation activities used by savvy procurement managers during the evaluation process is the matching of the bidders’ responses to the technical and commercial requirements schedules and the bidders’ responses to the financial schedule.

In a nut shell, the idea behind technical and commercial to financial matching, shortened to “matching”, is to ensure all bids are evaluated fairly and on a like-for-like basis. To use the common jargon: “We need to ensure we are comparing apples with apples”.

The following diagram shows the process which is described in the text below.

Introduction


Read More
2 Comments

    Author

    I have been involved a most aspects of procurement management and have spent a substantial part of the past 25 years working and learning the business. My most recent client was Australia Post where I successfully managed, on their behalf, a large Procurement Event for a replacement of Australia Post’s mid-range computing platform.

    Picture
    cmwilson@netspace.net.au
    www.busdox.com
    Picture
    View Colin Wilson's profile on LinkedIn

    Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner

    Powered by FeedBurner


    Archives

    May 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014

    Categories

    All
    Analysis
    Assessment Model
    Brand
    Business
    Evaluation
    Logo
    Marketing
    Matching
    Procurement
    Products
    Sourcing Strategy
    TCO
    Total Cost Of Ownership
    Validation

Site Map

Products
Services
Pricing
Library
Articles
Procurement
Previews
About
FAQ
Contact

Follow Us

Powered by FeedBurner

View Colin Wilson's profile on LinkedIn

Site Information

Policy
Copyright
Privacy
Disclaimer
General T's & C's